Toronto address · Ward 22, Scarborough-Agincourt
2686 Midland Ave
The City of Toronto has 4 building permits since 2017 (1 still open) on record for this address.
Building permits
Every permit the City lists for this address since 2017, and any still open from before, newest first.
- Cancelled
Heating and ventilation
HVAC - Proposal to construct a two-storey garden suite complete with a rear yard deck.
Applied Feb 24, 2025 · completed Mar 7, 2025 · Permit 25 121030 HVA
- Cancelled
Plumbing
Plumbing - Proposal to construct a two-storey garden suite complete with a rear yard deck.
Applied Feb 24, 2025 · completed Mar 7, 2025 · Permit 25 121030 PLB
- Cancelled
Small residential project · New laneway / rear yard suite
Proposal to construct a two-storey garden suite complete with a rear yard deck.
Applied Feb 24, 2025 · completed Mar 7, 2025 · 1 home added · Permit 25 121030 BLD
- Inspections under way
Small residential project · Accessory Building(s)
Proposed construction shed in the rear yard ( already built)
Applied Oct 14, 2009 · issued Oct 29, 2010 · Permit 09 178809 BLD
Committee of Adjustment
No applications to the City's Committee of Adjustment for this address since 2017. That's where an owner asks for a minor variance (a small exception to the zoning by-law) or a consent to divide a lot.
What’s planned nearby
Development sites within 500 m
No rezoning, site plan, subdivision or condominium file open within 500 m, and no pre-construction project on the site.
Neighbours’ Committee of Adjustment files within 250 m
80 Glen Watford Dr · Minor variance
To construct a new two-storey duplex with an attached garage. The existing dwelling will be demolished. This application was previously deferred at the August 3, 2025 hearing.
190 m away · filed May 14, 2025 · Approved
64 Glen Watford Dr · Minor variance
To construct a new two-storey detached dwelling. The existing one-storey detached dwelling will be demolished. Cross-reference previous Minor Variance Application A0110/21SC.
170 m away · filed Nov 15, 2024 · Approved
66 Glen Watford Dr · Minor variance
To demolish the existing dwelling and to construct a new two-storey detached dwelling. Cross reference previous Minor Variance application at this property A0111/21SC.
150 m away · filed Nov 15, 2024 · Approved
2657 Midland Ave · Minor variance
To permit the construction of a new, two-storey dwelling fronting Montgomery Avenue. Refer to Consent Application B0065/21SC and Minor Variance Application A0342/21SC.
220 m away · filed Oct 6, 2021 · Refused
2657 Midland Ave · Consent
To permit the severance of the rear portion of 2357/2359 Midland Avenue to create a new residential lot to be conveyed fronting on Montgomery Avenue. The proposed new lot is to be constructed with a new two-storey dwelling. No alterations to the existing dwelling are proposed which will remain on the proposed retained lot. This development proposal requires variances to the regulations of the existing Zoning By-law(s). NOTE: This application was deferred on May 5, 2022 in order to accurately identify all required variances to the Zoning By-laws. Cross Reference Minor Variance Applications A03…
220 m away · filed Oct 6, 2021 · Refused
2657 Midland Ave · Minor variance
To permit the existing dwelling to remain on the proposed retained lot. No alterations are proposed to the existing dwelling. Refer to Consent Application B0065/21SC and Minor Variance Application A0341/21SC.
220 m away · filed Oct 6, 2021 · Refused
86 Glen Watford Dr · Minor variance
To construct a new two-storey detached dwelling with integral three car garage.
250 m away · filed May 28, 2021 · Approved
74 Glen Watford Dr · Minor variance
160 m away · filed Mar 12, 2021 · Application withdrawn
From the City of Toronto’s open data: building permits (active, and cleared since 2017), Committee of Adjustment applications and address points, this record updated Sep 29, 2026, and the development sites from its Development Applications data. Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence – Toronto. Construction cost estimates and contractors’ names are left out on purpose, and nothing here names an owner.