Toronto address · Ward 23, Scarborough North
74 Purvis Cres
The City of Toronto has 1 building permit since 2017 (1 still open) on record for this address.
Building permits
Every permit the City lists for this address since 2017, and any still open from before, newest first.
- Inspections under way
Small residential project · Canopy
work description: new wood canopy at side of single family dwellingexisting use: single family dwellingproposed use: single family dwelling
Applied Jan 5, 2005 · issued Jan 5, 2005 · Permit 05 100348 BLD
Committee of Adjustment
No applications to the City's Committee of Adjustment for this address since 2017. That's where an owner asks for a minor variance (a small exception to the zoning by-law) or a consent to divide a lot.
What’s planned nearby
Development sites within 500 m
No rezoning, site plan, subdivision or condominium file open within 500 m, and no pre-construction project on the site.
Neighbours’ Committee of Adjustment files within 250 m
15 Rayward Crt · Minor variance
210 m away · filed Sep 18, 2026 · Accepted
1088 Progress Ave · Minor variance
The applicant is seeking relief from the provisions of the Zoning By-law to permit the already constructed 105 stacked townhouse units in phase 1 site, municipally known as 80 Orchid Place Drive, 90 Orchid Place and 1070 Progress Avenue.
230 m away · filed Jul 13, 2017 · Approved
1088 Progress Ave · Minor variance
The applicant is seeking relief from the provisions of the Zoning By-law to permit a mixed-use high-rise (18 storey with an 8 storey podium) building, phase 2 on the northern portion of the site, fronting Sheppard Avenue.
230 m away · filed Jul 13, 2017 · Application withdrawn
From the City of Toronto’s open data: building permits (active, and cleared since 2017), Committee of Adjustment applications and address points, this record updated Sep 29, 2026, and the development sites from its Development Applications data. Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence – Toronto. Construction cost estimates and contractors’ names are left out on purpose, and nothing here names an owner.