Toronto address · Ward 9, Davenport
364 Lauder Ave
The City of Toronto has 1 building permit since 2017 on record for this address.
Building permits
Every permit the City lists for this address since 2017, and any still open from before, newest first.
- Cancelled
Small residential project · Garage
Proposal to demolish existing garage and constuct new detached garage at rear
Applied Mar 29, 2019 · issued Apr 24, 2019 · completed Apr 24, 2026 · Permit 19 132586 BLD
Committee of Adjustment
No applications to the City's Committee of Adjustment for this address since 2017. That's where an owner asks for a minor variance (a small exception to the zoning by-law) or a consent to divide a lot.
What’s planned nearby
Development sites within 500 m
No rezoning, site plan, subdivision or condominium file open within 500 m, and no pre-construction project on the site.
Neighbours’ Committee of Adjustment files within 250 m
386 Lauder Ave · Minor variance
To alter the existing two-storey detached dwelling by enclosing a portion of the existing front porch into habitable space.
90 m away · filed Sep 3, 2026 · Hearing scheduled
408 Lauder Ave · Minor variance
To alter the existing two-and-one-half-storey detached dwelling by constructing a front one-storey addition (porch enclosure). Also, to construct a new one-storey ancillary building (shed), in the rear yard. The existing rear shed will be demolished.
200 m away · filed Jul 3, 2026 · Hearing scheduled
416 Lauder Ave · Minor variance
To alter the existing two-storey semi-detached dwelling by enclosing a portion of the front covered porch into habitable space with a new exterior staircase, and to construct a new rear two-storey addition with a basement walkout. The existing rear ancillary building (detached garage) will be maintained and unaltered.
220 m away · filed Sep 29, 2025 · Approved
3 Rosecliffe Ave · Minor variance
To legalize and to maintain the rear one-storey addition (abutting the west portion of the existing rear one-storey east side addition), as well as the complete second storey addition. There will be a rear ground level deck with stairs. Also, to legalize and to maintain the new one-storey detached ancillary building (one-car garage) in the rear yard. These additions have been constructed without an authorized building permit(s).
250 m away · filed May 2, 2025 · Approved
409 Northcliffe Blvd · Minor variance
To alter the existing one-storey detached dwelling by constructing ground floor addition (including a basement level), a complete second and third storey addition with rear balconies, and a rear ground floor deck with stairs.There will be a total of four residential dwelling units on this lot.
210 m away · filed Mar 27, 2025 · Approved
406 Northcliffe Blvd · Minor variance
To alter the existing two-and-one-half-storey detached dwelling by constructing a rear second storey addition and a complete third storey addition with a rear third storey balcony (above the second storey portion of the dwelling).
210 m away · filed Jul 30, 2024 · Approved
240 Glenholme Ave · Minor variance
To construct a one-storey ancillary building containing a garden suite (with rear (north facing) roof dormer) in the rear yard. The existing garage will be demolished.
240 m away · filed Jun 12, 2023 · Approved
412 Lauder Ave · Minor variance
To permit the existing three-unit duplex which was constructed without the benefit of a building permit. Also, to alter the existing two-storey detached dwelling (duplex) by constructing a complete third storey addition, a rear three-storey addition, a side addition at the second and third storeys (which will be cantilevered above the shared driveway), and a front second storey balcony.
210 m away · filed Sep 30, 2022 · Approved
From the City of Toronto’s open data: building permits (active, and cleared since 2017), Committee of Adjustment applications and address points, this record updated Sep 29, 2026, and the development sites from its Development Applications data. Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence – Toronto. Construction cost estimates and contractors’ names are left out on purpose, and nothing here names an owner.